|
|
Post by matthew on Feb 23, 2005 18:00:39 GMT -5
Yeah, but, apparently SOMEone can't tell the difference.  Yep that'd be me *still lost but pretends like I'm not* Hmm.... Yes, I see what you mean... ... that part is hard too... hmm.... yes... LHW is refering to his entry in SOTW a couple of weeks ago. It looked so good i thought it was a photo. Kindofa compliment don't yer think  ? |
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Feb 23, 2005 19:12:23 GMT -5
Oh, you mean his sunset one? I liked that one a lot....
|
|
|
|
Post by silverstar on Feb 24, 2005 15:51:27 GMT -5
That wasn't a photo? Wow...ok. Go M@ *clasps hands and bows* Very impressive. Silver |
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Feb 24, 2005 17:20:05 GMT -5
So ya'll are tlaking about the sunset one? I agree! LHW! That was truly magnificent... that siggy...
|
|
|
|
Post by lhw on Feb 24, 2005 17:40:02 GMT -5
You all are most kind. Thank you.  Except M@, of course. |
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Feb 24, 2005 20:19:27 GMT -5
lol... again, you two are nuts... NO! I'm sorry, M@ is nuts but LHW, who is totally convinced that being crazy means that he is better than M@, says that he is crazy!  lol... |
|
|
|
Post by lorielle on Feb 24, 2005 21:36:13 GMT -5
I am lost, but no matter... I just have a question... I can use paintings right?
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Feb 24, 2005 21:55:39 GMT -5
I think... as long as it isn't a picture... confusing, huh? Nvm, don't listen to me... I'll let M@ answer this one... lol...
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Feb 24, 2005 21:57:21 GMT -5
LOL I totally agree with you, Michael That question confused me, too. I am waiting for Matt on that one, too hehe ;D |
|
|
|
Post by matthew on Feb 24, 2005 22:40:33 GMT -5
I am lost, but no matter... I just have a question... I can use paintings right? Hmmm. good point. i suppose in a way it's kind of the same thing because a picture of a painting is a photgraph, isn't it? So paintings are not allowed (i guess, unless someone disagrees with me on this point). sigh why can't things be simple... |
|
|
|
Post by lhw on Feb 24, 2005 22:45:29 GMT -5
I'd say it depends on the type of painting, and how it's used.
If it's one that's like a photo, and/or just being used as a background, then I'd say no.
But, if it's a classic style painting (like the Mona Lisa or something), and you're using various effect on it to enhance/change its look, then I'd say go for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Feb 24, 2005 22:46:31 GMT -5
lol Yeah. I know... but, I was about to say exactly that, Matt. And then I second guessed myself. lol So, good call I think that is right. |
|
|
|
Post by lorielle on Feb 24, 2005 22:51:40 GMT -5
Okay.... I'm inclined to agree with LHW but I understand your point.
Pixel art, like Shan's penguin is ok though, correct? I have some brushes that I downloaded a long time ago that are of some of Waterhouse's paintings... could I use those?
|
|
|
|
Post by matthew on Feb 24, 2005 23:00:10 GMT -5
Okay.... I'm inclined to agree with LHW but I understand your point. for me it's like the same thing. take this sig for example.  I took an image from a painting and edited it and arranged it just like i would of done with a photograph, so to me it's the same thing. yeah pixel art is ok. and so are the brushes |
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Feb 25, 2005 11:23:19 GMT -5
Such simple requirements... who would have thought that they would be so confusing? lol... |
|
|
|
Post by lhw on Feb 25, 2005 11:26:20 GMT -5
That's what happens when a Squirrel runs things...everybody knows that they're control freaks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Feb 25, 2005 15:25:31 GMT -5
I didn't know that but I do mow! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by matthew on Feb 26, 2005 7:28:04 GMT -5
Something from the squirrel  squeeep! |
|
|
|
Post by admin on Feb 26, 2005 14:53:01 GMT -5
That is really awesome, Matt!! I LOVE it!!! |
|
|
|
Post by matthew on Feb 27, 2005 7:57:39 GMT -5
Thanks Shan It came together in the end |
|
