|
|
Post by Michael on Apr 16, 2005 1:04:34 GMT -5
Naw, I just looked and you can barely tell! Great job, JHW! *thumbs up*  I love it! I'm going to change my affiliate table soon! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by matthew on Apr 16, 2005 1:37:34 GMT -5
i wouldn't of noticed it either if you didn't mention it, but when it's your own work its hard not to notice these 'imperfections' esp' when its magnified. even now i notice it, it doesn't look any less good.  |
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Apr 16, 2005 1:39:57 GMT -5
I agree with M@. he put it in good words....  ;D |
|
|
|
Post by lhw on Apr 16, 2005 6:23:12 GMT -5
Thanks, guys. |
|
|
|
Post by lhw on Apr 16, 2005 7:25:00 GMT -5
Meh, I decided to go with a finishing effect that maintained the background integrity after all. So, it's now been updated. lol
|
|
|
|
Post by matthew on Apr 16, 2005 15:56:11 GMT -5
Sometimes wish i was more of a perfectionist ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by matthew on Apr 16, 2005 16:38:33 GMT -5
I just spotted a problem, Rich. In I.E the animation leaves a couple of pixel wide borders across the bottom and right hand side of the image. you being a perfectionist and all made me wonder if you were seeing this in Netscape so i check and they didn't show there. It looks as if your mini-banner isn't cross browser.  |
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Apr 16, 2005 18:52:26 GMT -5
Oi, I see it too... so sorry, Rich... so sorry.... maybe you can work on it a few more hours... lol... but hope you're able to fix it! |
|
|
|
Post by lhw on Apr 16, 2005 22:31:28 GMT -5
Meh, it's the browser, not the image. I just went thru all 223 frames, and there's nothing extra in any of them: all the frames are clean.
Just another reason why everyone should use NS/Mozilla. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by matthew on Apr 16, 2005 23:14:45 GMT -5
wonder what the cause of that is then? Just as long as your happy with it |
|
|
|
Post by lhw on Apr 16, 2005 23:32:50 GMT -5
My guess is that it's the way the browser is buffering the frames. Anyway, the 2 nd SOTW Contest is up (along with the voting for the first). Here's my entry for the new one:  |
|
|
|
Post by matthew on Apr 17, 2005 0:27:19 GMT -5
Nice sig LHW . I'm guessing the theme is Fantasy? don't tell I'll go look for myself btw, you've just made our 2000th post! I wish i had some kind of pressie to give you ;D |
|
|
|
Post by lhw on Apr 17, 2005 8:38:12 GMT -5
btw, you've just made our 2000th post! I wish i had some kind of pressie to give you ;D *Looks at post count* *Shakes head* *Mumbles* Must be the metric system.Um, thanks. EDIT: No, it's not fantasy. Close those...kinda. lol |
|
|
|
Post by merci on Apr 17, 2005 9:25:55 GMT -5
Anyway, the 2 nd SOTW Contest is up (along with the voting for the first). Here's my entry for the new one: Oh yeah, the voting. Awesome sig!! On my way to vote on the first contest. |
|
|
|
Post by matthew on Apr 17, 2005 21:08:17 GMT -5
*Looks at post count* *Shakes head* *Mumbles* Must be the metric system.Um, thanks. EDIT: No, it's not fantasy. Close those...kinda. lol yeah, i supose it helps if you have admin access |
|
|
|
Post by lhw on Apr 17, 2005 21:29:28 GMT -5
Thanks, Merci. And I'm still trying to figure out which system equates 200 posts to 2000. lol |
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Apr 18, 2005 14:31:51 GMT -5
I don't know but you know that there are 100 millimeters in a centemeter.... I think.... wow, so fasinating! *signs*
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 18, 2005 14:42:34 GMT -5
And there's a thousand meters in a kilometer hehe I just love metric! LOL But, I think what M@ was meaning was that LHW made the whole board reach its 2000 post |
|
|
|
Post by lhw on Apr 18, 2005 15:26:31 GMT -5
Oh. My bad.  I just figured he mistyped "200" since I just hit that...I never even looked at the total post count. lol |
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 18, 2005 16:44:34 GMT -5
LOL That's alright. It is a quite weird actually that you reached 200 and the board reached 2000 at the same time |
|
